Multiple Partitions or One Big C: Drive
April 12th, 2007I answered a question on a newsgroup today that I thought might have general interest.
The poster asked about benefits to having multiple hard drives and multiple partitions. Again, my answer is for PC workstations, not servers.
Using multiple partitions is sometimes advantageous for organizing data. In the past there was efficiency (smaller data chunks used) in smaller partitions. Nobody worries about that anymore. Drives are huge and cheap and efficiency is a lost art in the computing world, unfortunately.
Recently, most seem to recommend just one big partition. For the most part, I agree. If the drive is sufficiently larger than I think is needed I will sometimes leave some unallocated space in case I want a 2nd OS or an Acronis Secure Zone at a later date.
Frustratingly, if a 2nd partition is available to the OS (and the Acronis Secure Zone is NOT), sometimes Microsoft will dump a big temporary file there or Outlook’s MSO cache without even asking. Which means of course that malware can also access it.
This is an important point because the poster is using a 2nd drive and/or partition to backup to. He wants to be able to fall back to a “known good configuration”.
This is why it’s nice that a USB drive that can be unplugged - even carried to another location for portable need or backup security.
A drive image backed up to 2nd drive or USB drive and restore CD might give you more security and flexibility than just another location on your PC. Drive images are compressed to save space, meaning you can have many image copies from various dates.
You’ve heard me bang the drum on Acronis True Image. Here are links to some other comments regarding backing up to a USB hard drive.




